Conditional Ought, a Game Theoretical Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a new consequentialist deontic logic in which the relation of preference over sets of possible worlds and the relation of conditional dominance are both transitive. This logic validate the principle that absolute ought can be derived from conditional ought whenever the conditional statement is the agent’s absolute ought. Ought about conditionals is not implied by conditional ought in this logic.
منابع مشابه
The role of genes and environment in the phenotypic expression of alternative mating tactics: a reply to Buzatto et al.
Buzatto et al. [1] state that our recommendation to bring together previous, dichotomous game-theoretical approaches of modelling alternative strategies and a conditional strategy is unnecessary as fusion synthesis of this kind has already been carried out via the environmental threshold model. By presenting a verbal model in the conclusion and future direction section of our review paper, thes...
متن کاملA game theoretical approach for pricing in a two-level supply chain considering advertising and servicing
This paper considers the advertising, pricing, and service decisions simultaneously to coordinate the supply chain with a manufacturer and a retailer. The amount of market demand is influenced by advertising, pricing and service decisions. In this paper, three well-known approaches to the game theory, including the Nash, the Stackelberg-retailer, and the cooperative game are exploited to study ...
متن کاملChisholm's Paradox and Conditional Oughts
Since it was presented in 1963, Chisholm’s paradox has attracted constant attention in the deontic logic literature, but without the emergence of any definitive solution. We claim this is due to its having no single solution. The paradox actually presents many challenges to the formalization of deontic statements, including (1) context sensitivity of unconditional oughts, (2) formalizing condit...
متن کاملSocial cycling and conditional responses in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game
How humans make decisions in non-cooperative strategic interactions is a big question. For the fundamental Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) model game system, classic Nash equilibrium (NE) theory predicts that players randomize completely their action choices to avoid being exploited, while evolutionary game theory of bounded rationality in general predicts persistent cyclic motions, especially in fin...
متن کاملمطالعه تطبیقی دو منظر «بازیشناسی» و «روایتشناسی» به تحلیل ظرفیتهای زیباشناختی بازیهای رایانهای هدفمند
Serious Computer Games are a kind of computer games that in contrary of mainstream computer games’ industry, necessity of mercantile benefits has less importance in their circle of production. Desired aim for producing Serious Games is make obvious informational, attitudinal, behavioral and cognitive changes in players in according to definite pedagogical, educational, instructional, prom...
متن کامل